Caren Norden heads the Cell Biology of Tissue Morphogenesis lab at the Instituto Gulbenkian de Ciência, where she also serves as Deputy Director of Science. Her latest paper was posted as a preprint and submitted to the journal through Review Commons. We spoke to Dr. Norden about preprints, peer review, imaging and neuronal migration.
Our latest survey shows that the overwhelming majority of our authors and reviewers support our journal agnostic peer-review process and consider the elimination of multiple cycles of peer review to be the most important benefit of Review Commons. Authors also regard the preparation of the authors’ detailed response as the rate-limiting step for the public posting of refereed preprints.
EMBO, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, eLife/Sciety, and the Knowledge Futures Group have recently launched a collaborative pilot project called DocMaps. The project’s goal is to create a common framework that will allow the machine-readable tracking of the peer reviews of individual preprints.
As of August 1, 2021, Review Commons will require all authors to post their manuscript as a preprint, prior to transfer to an affiliate journal. In return, all the affiliate journals provide authors with extended scooping protection.
The pandemic has shown how preprints accelerate the dissemination of research findings, but it also highlights the crucial importance of peer review.